catwalksalone: happy grey cat surrounded by flowers (ratjam 07)
Cats. Not to be trusted. ([personal profile] catwalksalone) wrote in [community profile] rat_jam2007-03-31 05:01 pm
Entry tags:

Meta: Whos On First: An Old-School Doctor Who Primer for Fans of Nine, Ten, and Torchwood

MJ Panel Mod: Kylie Lee

"Whos On First: An Old-School Doctor Who Primer for Fans of Nine, Ten, and Torchwood," modded by Kylie Lee (LJ: kylielee1000)

Please note that Season 3 of the new Doctor Who airs today!

Doctor Who 2005 shares many elements with classic Doctor Who (1963-1989; 1996 TV movie), but the new show has updated the old for an audience that is perhaps not familiar with the old show. The
producers thus walk a fine line between pleasing both audiences. A sprawling canon needs to be honored, as does the show's famously low-budget production values.

After a brief sketch of some of the major differences, some of which (such as destroying the Doctor's past) are ways of hitting the reset button to permit new narrative directions, we'll talk--perhaps in historical terms, perhaps not--about the following things, which resonante from the old show into the new:

1. The alien nature of the Doctor.

2. The role of the companions.

3. The relationship of the Doctor to his companions.

4. Romance (snogging in the TARDIS??).

5. Villains that cross over from the old series to the new, particularly the Daleks and the Cybermen.

6. The coherence of the new universe, which includes Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures.

[identity profile] bipagan.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
The Husband got me into Dr. Who through our lovely ninth. Currently, I'm sitting in a room filled with Dr. Who books, videos, dvds, books on cassette, etc. His goal in life is to collect every authorized print/audio/video of his favorite fandom. So, when I had a question about sexuality and the Dr, I turned to him. He had a bit to say on the subject which boiled down to, "The fanboys who say the Dr. is non-sexual have apparently not been watching/reading what I have." The Dr. is a sexual being and yet it seems to be a rather fervent feeling that he be viewed as a non-sexual being. Why is that? When I listen to the books on car trips, he sure as heck seems like a sexual being.