Sorry to be so late replying to you. RL got in the way I'm afraid.
That definitely rings true. It is a convenient way to make said character available to whatever the writers want to set the character up for next.
So okay. How about we turn that situation on it's head a bit and say that if that's the ideal situation then what if the main character (i.e. the protaganist) is the one doing the betraying? Although it is not a plot device often used it still happens sometimes.
And yet a lot of times when it does happen we are still meant to sympathise with said character because why else would they be portrayed in every other way as a protaganist rather than defecting to the antagonists side?
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2007-04-07 09:25 am (UTC)That definitely rings true. It is a convenient way to make said character available to whatever the writers want to set the character up for next.
So okay. How about we turn that situation on it's head a bit and say that if that's the ideal situation then what if the main character (i.e. the protaganist) is the one doing the betraying? Although it is not a plot device often used it still happens sometimes.
And yet a lot of times when it does happen we are still meant to sympathise with said character because why else would they be portrayed in every other way as a protaganist rather than defecting to the antagonists side?